Qasmi sb, let me correct you and Ikram sb. As per Quran the death sentence is only in case some one killed another. Banu Quraiza did not kill anyone. They broke the agreement. Punishment for that was ousting them, possessing their belongings or such things but not killing. History is, most of the times, inaccurate.
Verifying hadeeths through background checks of the narators’ seven generations up is impossible. You can not verify even your great grand father character what to say about seven generation up. Also who will say, "my fourth ( for example) generation father was not of good character”?. Can it be assumed every varifyer’s all upward generations were of good character? Even the great Omar’s son Abdullah, who was also a sahabi, committed very serious sin and was lashed!
Why we buy this unreasonable claim that Arabs were capable of remembering perfectly a saying said 200 years earlier? Are we muslims not too gullible? Or can not face the mullahs to say they are telling lies.
Taimur USA
Qasmi sb, let me correct you and Ikram sb. As per Quran the death sentence is only in case some one killed another. Banu Quraiza did not kill anyone. They broke the agreement. Punishment for that was ousting them, possessing their belongings or such things but not killing. History is, most of the times, inaccurate.
Verifying hadeeths through background checks of the narators’ seven generations up is impossible. You can not verify even your great grand father character what to say about seven generation up. Also who will say, "my fourth ( for example) generation father was not of good character”?. Can it be assumed every varifyer’s all upward generations were of good character? Even the great Omar’s son Abdullah, who was also a sahabi, committed very serious sin and was lashed!
Why we buy this unreasonable claim that Arabs were capable of remembering perfectly a saying said 200 years earlier? Are we muslims not too gullible? Or can not face the mullahs to say they are telling lies.
Taimur USA